(by Rising Horus)
Dear readers' of NBN, my name is Rising Horus. Given a opportunity by Poiuytr, I would like to bring your attention to the possiblity that a pure hydrogen bomb (=a micro-nuke) was use at WTC, 911. Although most of you here know that 911 was an inside job, you may think I am crazy. After all, nukes are too big and too dirty. If it is used, anyone would notice
and the Geiger counters never stop buzzing.
But, they may already have a very small hydrogen bomb that produces little radiation. It is called a pure hydrogen bomb and is believed to be an application of "cold fusion." This theory was first proposed by an anonymous. Finnish military expert, which was followed by Dr. Ed Ward (a
contributer to Rense) and a Japanese internet journalist, Mr. Koshimizu. Note that they do not claim US did not use Thermite etc. (Perhaps, US used various bombs.)
Before you neglect without reading, please think of the following points. These are the things "Thermite theory" of Steven jones etc. perhaps cannot explain.
(Note also that Jones is a well-known expert of cold fusion.)
(1) Pool of melted steel beneath WTC, even months after 911.
(2) A lot of first responders became cancer.
(3) Hundreds of bodied evaporated. Today's DNA test is so developed
it can be done if just a tiny part of one's body is found.
(4) Concrete dust cloud. The particles were unnaturally fine.
(5) Unusual amount of Tritium (Hydrogen with 2 neutrons) was found at
WTC, as Ward claims.
Here's Koshimizu webpage. Please take a look. I also would like to hear your opinions. Please post your comments. If you are convinced, spread this information.
But, why trying to spread this theory? Perhaps, most of people think like this:
(A) It is very important to let people know that destruction of WTC was controlled demolition. But, it is not wise to discuss what kind of bombs were used, since only experts can understand it. Moreover, cold fusion (aka LENR) was
labelled as "pseudo-science." It is too dangerous to go into it.
It is true, of course. I used to think like that, too. However, the merits of spreading this theory is:
(B) US (at least, one faction of the ruling class of US) is trying to start a world war as a "final gamble" before they perish.
In that war, they would use pure-hydrogen bombs as secret weapons. So, letting people know this may prevent a nuclear exchange. (Most people are brainwashed to believe that nukes are too big and too dirty to be used. No, there may be very small nukes with little nuclear fallout. It can be used for "population reduction." )
As a byproduct, this information would make people realize that.
(C) Cold fusion (aka, solid fusion, or LENR) is real.
So, humans may not rely only on petrolium for energy source, which means that Rockefeller's days are over. The big wars in the last century were over petrolium. So, it means the
world may become safer.
If given a chance, I would like to write an article on energy
production via LENR, which is much more difficult than making bombs, since it must not let out radiation at all.
(Or goole it with "Arata-Zhang experiment," etc. Or,
In May 2008, Prof. Arata, Osaka university, decleared that he
successfully achieved "solid fusion" and excess heat and Helium was certainly detected, while no radiation was produced. This is a real breakthrough if true. But, essentially all the media neglected, as one could easily expect.)